March 2019

Discussing Expectations with your PI teaser image
As a graduate student, you are in for the long haul! Especially if you are getting a PhD, you will be spending many years in your program, which means many years working with a PI (Principal Investigator, aka advisor/mentor/supervisor/boss). Especially when stress is high, things can go wrong and the relationship between you and your PI can be strained. Having difficulties is inevitable, simply because of the nature of research and academia. However, knowing what is expected of you and what you expect of your PI can do wonders for your communication.

More and more PI’s are creating contracts with students that outline expectations. This can be such a great tool for all parties. However, they are usually only what is expected of the student and are not discussed again. If you are going to have a contract, I encourage it to include expectations for both parties and to be updated or discussed throughout the student’s program. After years of talking with other students and insight from some amazing faculty, I have made a list of items I think are important to discuss with your PI. The earlier you can discuss these and can document what was decided, the easier it will be to handle conflict when it arises.
 
  1. Communication. How often should you meet in-person? How should you send updates and how often? Do you need to schedule meetings or can you drop by their office? Is there other lab personnel you need to meet with or send updates? Will there be lab meetings and what will they cover? Are you allowed to or encouraged to go to other lab meetings?
  2. Training. What training is required and who is in charge of the training (i.e. lab safety and lab specific training, animal training, etc.)? Are you required to train others in the lab? How often do you need to complete training? Who do you need to go to when you need help? How many and what classes will you be taking? What kind of publications should you be reading and how many should you read each week? Will you or can you discuss articles with the PI or others in lab?
  3. Research. What is your project(s)? Are you expected or allowed to help on other projects? Do experiments need prior approval and by whom? How much time should you spend on reading, planning, or performing lab work each week? Are you expected or encouraged to write or help write protocols or grants? What is the procedure for proposing new research or experiments? How will you determine if you are making progress on the research and what will happen if progress is no longer being made (due to failed experiments, etc.)? This is one of the biggest issues for graduate students. Science is hard and sometimes doing a novel experiment means it may fail, and you may not know why. You do not want to get stuck in a project that is not working for years and not have anything to graduate. Discuss what will happen if it is not working and have a back-up plan so you can still graduate in a timely manner.
  4. Milestones. What are the milestones you should plan to reach and how will these be met? What is the process for selecting a committee and who gets to decide who is on the committee? When should your committee be decided? What is the expected timeline for passing exams, completing coursework, submitting a proposal, etc.? What is your expected graduation date? What is the policy if you are not reaching milestones as expected?
  5. Funding. How are you financially supported or are you expected to fund yourself? Is there a limitation or requirement to continue receiving your funding (time, GPA, etc.)? Are you encouraged to apply for fellowships and will your PI help you identify and apply?
  6. Lab Responsibilities. What duties are there in lab (checking incubators, making media, filling water, checking equipment, etc.) and who is in charge of each task? Are any tasks shared? Who is in charge of ordering supplies? If you are in charge- how it is done (budget, how to pay, etc.)? What to do when equipment needs repair?
  7. Work Hours and Extra Circular Activities. Are you expected to be in the lab at specific days and times? Will you be working at different locations? How many hours per week are you expected to work and how do those hours need to be spent? Are you allowed to participate in other activities (student organizations, seminars, workshops, etc.)? What constitutes professional development and what professional development activities should you plan to complete? What seminars are you required to attend? What is the policy for vacations, sick time, personal days, etc.?
  8. Conferences and Presenting. Are you required or encouraged to present your research and how often? Where are you able to present and how will travel be funded (local, national, international?) Are conference costs covered (or only covered if presenting)?
  9. Managing Experiments. Data, and Samples. What is the policy on having a lab notebook or tracking your experiments (physical notebook, online, electronic document)? What is the policy on sharing protocols or experiments (for past, present, and future research)? How should data and results be stored? How often should data be saved? Who will collect your samples and how will they be stored? Do you need to take inventory of all your samples (and how)? Who else may be using your samples?
  10. Manuscripts and Other Publications. What constitutes authorship on a paper? How is the order of authors determined? What other ways, besides authorship, would student contributions be acknowledged? Are you encouraged to write review papers? Are there expectations for number of manuscripts published (how many first-authors)? Is publication a requirement to graduate? Are you encouraged to publish other ways (blogs, Op-Eds, etc.)?
  11. Conflicts. How should certain types of conflicts be handled? How should conflicts be handled with people in the lab, outside of the lab, etc.? Who can you go to in your department, college, or university for help with a conflict?

This is by no means a comprehensive list, but you can already see the plethora of topics that are important to be discussed. Give some thought to these items and take the initiative to discuss them with your PI. Make sure you also think about what you would like from your PI and be prepared to agree on their expectations as well. If you discuss these things in person, write them down and send a follow-up email that includes what you decided on. That way you both have it for reference and can verify you are on the same page. If the PI already has a contract, don’t be afraid to suggest changes to it and keep in mind you do not have to sign anything you do not agree to. If there are issues, reach out to other faculty or advisors to help mediate. Good luck and keep your head up! You can do it.

--- Cassandra Skenandore
Cassandra Skenandore is a Ph.D. student in the College of Veterinary Medicine & Biomedical Sciences
 

Related Content

Explore Grad Aggieland

News

Texas A&M Set to Host Young Scientists Selected to Participate in the 2024 Lindau Nobel Laureate Meeting

Per an agreement between the Council for the Lindau Nobel Laureate Meetings and Texas A&M, the university is set to support 21 exceptional undergraduates, graduate students and postdocs, eight of whom are Aggies, to attend the upcoming annual 73rd Nobel Laureate Meeting in Lindau, Germany from June 30 - July 5, 2024. On May 16 and 17, Texas A&M will host these 21 scholars for a pre-Lindau Meeting preparatory workshop. They will be joined by an additional 11 young scientists supported by Amgen, allowing for an intellectual exchange between all 32 individuals.

View All News
Blog

The grad school arc

If you’re just starting your Ph.D., especially in a STEM field, Serina talks in her latest post about the differences between each year of a 5-year Ph. D. program.

View All Blogs
Defense Announcement

Deep Learning for Molecular Geometry and Property Analysis

View All Defense
Announcements